If you’re an academic who wishes to submit your research proposal online, you must get approval for it from both your home institution and the institution you’re applying to.
You may still submit your research proposal using any other online service, such as the International Baccalaureate website or the European Research Council’s portal.
You may wish to ask your home institution whether its application for your grant may be submitted online.
You do not have to wait to be reviewed by both reviewers.
If your application is approved by both review centres, you must submit your proposals within 28 days of notification.
A federal court on Friday lifted a gag order prohibiting members of the public from discussing the lawsuit between the federal government and former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner and her husband, who worked on her 2013 congressional campaign.
Lawyers for the government objected to the order, contending the plaintiff can’t bring the case because the government has not paid her legal bills and has threatened her with contempt. They also argued it is unfair to taxpayers to allow taxpayers to sue under this “non-contempt” clause from the U.S. Constitution.
The order comes after the government’s appeal of an April 1 restraining order that had prevented the plaintiff and her husband from even discussing the case, which involves a dispute over how much taxpayers owe in back taxes.
The order lifted the gag order, allowing the plaintiff’s lawyers to continue providing legal support to her. They also can speak with the media about their client, but can’t discuss the details of the case.
The judge’s order also allows media coverage for other cases pending before U.S. courts, including one from the IRS targeting cases against conservative groups, which involve former Obama administration lawyers and their current employers.
The government argues that the “non-contempt” clause of the U.S. Constitution prevents the plaintiff from bringing legal action against her former employer “as may be” contemplated by the Constitution.
The plaintiffs argued they could continue to provide legal support to Lerner, or her husband through the government. The judge found that the plaintiffs could speak with the media “on matters pertaining to their respective cases if the same is not possible for their respective litigants under the non-contempt clause of the U.S. Constitution.”
The court will decide whether to reconsider the stay granted Friday, but it appears that it wants to continue to let the media and public hear what is occurring.
government grants for small business start up, government personal grants for individuals, us government grants for individuals, free grant applications, usagovernmentgrants.org scam calls